The Lighthouse in the Cup: Navigating the Hidden Calories and Choices in Your Daily Starbucks

Introduction: The Comfort of the Ritual, The Anxiety of the Unknown

The ritual was my anchor.

Every morning, at precisely 7:45 AM, I’d walk into the familiar green-and-wood embrace of my local Starbucks.

The hiss of the espresso machine, the low hum of conversation, the rich aroma of roasting beans—it was a sensory balm against the chaos of the day ahead.

My order was always the same, a simple, comforting constant: a grande dark roast, with a splash of half-and-half.

It was more than coffee; it was a small, predictable pleasure, a moment of personal solace I carved out for myself.

For years, this ritual was pure comfort.

But slowly, insidiously, a thread of anxiety began to weave its way into the fabric of my morning.

I was trying to be more mindful of my health, tracking my food, making conscious choices.

Yet, something felt off.

A stubborn plateau in my wellness goals had me scrutinizing every meal, every snack, and inevitably, my gaze fell upon the white-and-green cup in my hand.

The comfort of the ritual began to curdle into suspicion.

The question, at first a whisper and then a roar, became impossible to ignore: “What am I really putting into my body every morning?”

My journey for an answer began, as most do in this age, with a simple search.

I wanted to know the nutritional cost of my “splash of half-and-half.” What I found was not clarity, but a fog of ambiguity.

The term “splash,” I quickly discovered, is a nutritional ghost—a measurement with no body, no definition.

My search led me down a rabbit hole of online forums and discussion threads, where my personal frustration was echoed by a chorus of other health-conscious consumers.

The most revealing truths came from the people behind the counter.

Baristas on Reddit forums were unequivocal: there is no standard.

They “freepour” the cream directly from a carton.¹

One barista stated it plainly: “How much ‘extra half & half’ goes in is entirely up to the discretion of the person making the drink”.²

Another confirmed, “We just free pour so there is no regular splash”.¹

This was the core of the problem.

My desire for precision, a cornerstone of any health strategy, was fundamentally incompatible with the operational reality of a high-volume coffee shop.

Starbucks provides detailed nutritional information, but it’s based on “standard recipes”.³

The moment you customize—the moment you ask for that simple “splash”—the data becomes unreliable.

The company itself acknowledges that “because our products may be customized, exact information may vary”.³

This creates a systemic gap, a frustrating void where the responsibility for nutritional accounting is shifted entirely to the consumer, who is given no tools to succeed.

My anxiety, I realized, wasn’t a personal failing.

It was a predictable outcome of a system designed for speed and process consistency, not for the granular precision required for mindful eating.

The nutritional fog wasn’t an accident; it was a feature of the customizable beverage industry.

To navigate it, I understood I couldn’t rely on the provided maps.

I would have to build my own lighthouse.

Part I: The Lighthouse Analogy – A Framework for Clarity

Lost in this fog of nutritional ambiguity, I decided to stop flailing and start building.

I needed a framework, a mental model to bring order to the chaos of choice.

I envisioned a lighthouse, standing firm against the swirling mists.

Its purpose: to cast a clear, understandable beam of light on my daily decision, allowing me to navigate the treacherous waters of the Starbucks menu with confidence.

In this analogy, I am the Lighthouse Keeper.

I am the one responsible for operating the light, for understanding its mechanics, and for choosing the right beam for the journey ahead.

The consumer cannot be a passive passenger; they must be an active navigator.

The Light Source is the coffee itself—the brewed coffee or the espresso shots.

This is the fundamental, raw energy.

It is powerful and essential, but its character, how it is perceived from afar, is shaped entirely by the lens through which it shines.

For a plain black coffee or an Americano, the nutritional impact is negligible, typically around 5-10 calories with no fat or sugar.⁴

It is a pure, unadulterated beam.

The crucial component, the one the Lighthouse Keeper must master, is the Lens and its Power Source.

This is the milk, the cream, the dairy alternative—the addition that refracts and colors the light.

Each option at Starbucks is a different type of lens, with a unique set of optical properties (its macronutrient profile) and a specific energy consumption (its caloric cost).

Choosing the right lens is the key to safe navigation.

Here is the spectrum of lenses available to the Lighthouse Keeper:

• Heavy Cream: The High-Intensity Searchlight. This is a tightly focused, military-grade searchlight. Its beam is incredibly powerful and intense (very high in fat and calories), designed for a highly specific mission: illuminating the narrow, treacherous channel of a strict ketogenic diet. It cuts through the fog with unparalleled power but consumes an immense amount of energy to do so.⁵
• Half-and-Half (Breve): The Classic Fresnel Lens. This is the traditional, multi-faceted lens invented by Augustin-Jean Fresnel, the kind you see in iconic lighthouses. It appears simple from a distance, but it is a masterpiece of optical engineering, designed to cast a bright, satisfying, and far-reaching light. It is a complex and beautiful balance of properties (fat, carbohydrates, and protein) that makes it a versatile and reliable workhorse. To use it effectively, the keeper must understand its specific properties.⁵
• Whole & 2% Milk: The Broad Floodlight. This lens is designed to cast a wide, diffuse, and generally illuminating light. It provides good, overall brightness and a familiar, creamy quality (balanced macronutrients). It’s not as intense as the specialized lenses, but it gets the job done for general navigation. 2% milk is the default “house” setting at Starbucks, the light they turn on unless you ask for something different.⁹
• Nonfat (Skim) Milk: The Low-Intensity Ambient Light. This is a wide-angle, low-power lens that provides maximum coverage with minimum energy consumption. It illuminates the entire landscape faintly (lowest calorie dairy option), but the light it casts is thin, lacking the richness and brightness of other lenses.⁹
• Oat Milk: The Warm, Decorative Beam. This modern lens has become incredibly popular for the quality of its light—it’s warm, inviting, and exceptionally creamy. It creates the most aesthetically pleasing beam (best texture for lattes). However, its inviting glow is often powered by a significant external energy source, meaning it has a higher carbohydrate and sugar cost than other non-dairy alternatives.¹¹
• Almond Milk: The Hyper-Efficient LED. This is a modern marvel of efficiency. The LED lens is functional, sharp, and uses remarkably little energy (very low in calories and carbohydrates). It has become the go-to for keepers focused on energy conservation (calorie counting). However, the quality of its light—a cooler, thinner beam with a distinct character (nutty flavor)—is a departure from the traditional incandescence of dairy.⁹
• Soy Milk: The Original Alternative-Fuel Light. This was the first revolutionary alternative lens placed in the lighthouse. It provides a strong, balanced light, uniquely rich in protein. It was a game-changer, but now it competes with newer, more efficient technologies. It often comes with its own built-in power pack in the form of added sweeteners, which the keeper must account for.⁹

With this framework in place, my task was no longer to find a single “right” answer, but to become a master of my own lighthouse—to learn the properties of every lens and deploy them with intention.

Part II: Deconstructing the Fresnel Lens – The Unvarnished Truth About Half-and-Half

My investigation began with the lens that started it all: the classic, ubiquitous half-and-half.

To understand it, I had to first defeat the ambiguity of the “splash.” I needed a standardized, scientific unit of measurement to serve as my baseline.

After reviewing numerous nutritional databases and expert analyses, the most precise and useful unit emerged: one tablespoon (15 mL).

By synthesizing the most granular third-party analyses available, a clear picture of this lens’s core properties emerged.

A single, measured tablespoon of the half-and-half used at Starbucks contains approximately the following ⁸:

• Calories: 20
• Total Fat: 1.7 g (of which 1.1 g is saturated fat)
• Total Carbohydrates: 0.6 g
• Protein: 0.4 g
• Sugars: 0.6 g (these are naturally occurring milk sugars, or lactose, not added sugars)

Viewed in isolation, these numbers seem innocuous.

A mere 20 calories and just over half a gram of carbohydrates is a tiny price to pay for the creamy richness it adds.

This is the appeal of the Fresnel lens—it seems to deliver a bright, satisfying light for a very reasonable energy cost.

And if one were to use only a single, measured tablespoon, that perception would be accurate.

The danger, however, lies in the translation from a precise measurement to the real-world “free pour.” The comfortable middle ground that half-and-half occupies in our minds—not as lean as milk, not as decadent as cream—encourages a certain carelessness.

A “regular splash,” as estimated by both baristas and customers in online forums, could easily be two, three, or even four tablespoons.

At four tablespoons (a quarter cup), that “splash” is no longer 20 calories; it’s 80 calories, with 6.8 g of fat and 2.4 g of carbohydrates.²

An order of “extra cream” could push those numbers even higher.

This is how the seemingly benign choice can silently and methodically sabotage well-laid health plans.

The cumulative impact of a daily, unmeasured pour can amount to hundreds of extra calories per week.

It became clear that the nutritional risk of half-and-half is not intrinsic to its composition, but rather a consequence of its perception.

Heavy cream is widely understood to be a “calorie bomb,” a treat to be used with caution and respect.¹⁷

This perception encourages mindful portioning; a keto dieter might ask for just a small, specific amount.¹⁹

Half-and-half, on the other hand, doesn’t trigger the same psychological alarm bells.

It feels like a modest, reasonable choice, a simple step up from milk.⁵

This perception fosters mindless consumption.

The generous, unmeasured pour of “moderate” half-and-half can easily contribute more calories and carbohydrates than a small, carefully controlled dash of “extreme” heavy cream.

The psychological positioning of half-and-half as “not-so-bad” is, paradoxically, its greatest liability.

Further clarifying the landscape is the term “breve.” As experienced baristas explain, ordering a drink “breve” or asking for a “Caffè Breve” simply means that half-and-half is used in place of the standard milk.²⁰

A Caffè Breve is a latte made with steamed half-and-half.

It is not some exotic, separate ingredient; it is a latte made entirely with the Fresnel lens.

This transforms a standard grande latte from a 190-calorie drink made with 2% milk ²² into a far richer, more calorically dense beverage, demonstrating the profound impact of swapping one lens for another.

Part III: The Lighthouse Lineup – A Comparative Analysis of the Beams

With a clear understanding of half-and-half, the next step was to place it in context.

A Lighthouse Keeper must know the capabilities of every lens in their arsenal, not just their favorite one.

To do this, I needed to create a true apples-to-apples comparison, a master chart that would allow for immediate and clear analysis.

This required standardizing the unit of measurement across all options, moving away from the chaos of “splashes” and “cups” to a single, consistent unit: two tablespoons (1 oz or approximately 30 mL).

This serving size represents a realistic, modest addition to a cup of coffee and allows for a direct comparison of the nutritional “cost” of each choice.

The following guide was compiled by synthesizing data from a wide array of sources: official Starbucks nutrition facts for standard beverages ³, highly detailed third-party laboratory analyses ⁸, comprehensive nutritional databases ⁶, and the labels of Starbucks’ own at-home products.²⁴

This table is the master key for the Lighthouse Keeper, the chart that makes sense of it all.

The Lighthouse Keeper’s Guide to Starbucks Milk & Creamers

Choice (Lens & Power Source)	Lighthouse Analogy	Calories	Fat (g)	Carbs (g)	Sugar (g)	Key Characteristics & Use Case
Heavy Cream	High-Intensity Searchlight	~102	~11.0	~0.8	~0.8	Maximum fat, minimal carbs. The undisputed choice for strict ketogenic diets. Its extremely high calorie density demands disciplined portion control. A powerful tool for a very specific purpose.6
Half-and-Half	Classic Fresnel Lens	~40	~3.4	~1.2	~1.2	The balanced classic. Noticeably richer than milk but with less than a third of the fat of heavy cream. A satisfying, moderate choice whose primary danger lies in unmeasured, generous “splashes”.6
Whole Milk (3.25%)	Broad Floodlight	~18	~1.0	~1.4	~1.4	Creamy, familiar, and balanced. A good general-purpose choice for those who want a traditional dairy taste without the intensity of cream. Its carbohydrate and sugar content are notable for low-carb diets.3
2% Milk (Default)	Diffuse Floodlight	~15	~0.6	~1.5	~1.5	The Starbucks Standard. This is the default lens used in most espresso beverages unless another is specified. A slightly lighter, less rich version of whole milk, offering a small reduction in fat and calories.9
Nonfat (Skim) Milk	Low-Intensity Ambient	~10	~0.0	~1.5	~1.5	Lowest calorie dairy option. This lens sacrifices all fat and the associated richness for maximum energy savings. The result is a thin, watery texture, but the lowest caloric cost among dairy milks.9
Oat Milk	Warm, Decorative Beam	~20-25	~1.0	~2.5-4.0	~1.0-2.5	Creamy, popular, and plant-based. Offers the best texture, mimicking the creaminess of whole milk better than other non-dairy options. This comes at the cost of being the highest in carbohydrates among the alternatives.13
Almond Milk (Unsweetened)	Efficient LED Light	~5-10	~0.7	~0.5	~0.0	Lowest calorie and carb option overall. The champion for both calorie counters and many low-carb followers. The trade-off is a thinner texture and a distinct nutty flavor that differs significantly from dairy.14
Soy Milk (Sweetened)	Alternative-Fuel Light	~15-20	~0.5	~2.0	~1.5-2.0	High in plant-based protein. The original dairy alternative, it offers a creamy texture and a protein boost. However, the version used at Starbucks is typically sweetened, which adds to the sugar load compared to other options.9

This table represents the epiphany in data form.

It accomplishes what the standard Starbucks menu does not: it standardizes the unit of measurement, it consolidates fragmented data into a single, accessible location, and it enables direct, informed comparison.

For the first time, the Lighthouse Keeper can see with absolute clarity the precise cost of their choices.

The difference between adding oat milk versus almond milk is no longer a vague guess; it’s a concrete difference of several grams of carbohydrates per serving.

The trade-off between the rich flavor of half-and-half and the leanness of nonfat milk is quantified in calories and grams of fat.

This is the foundation of true nutritional control.

Part IV: Navigational Charts for Specific Journeys (The Diet Dilemma)

With the master chart of lenses in hand, the final step is to apply this knowledge to specific voyages.

A Lighthouse Keeper must not only know their equipment but also understand the nature of the journey they are undertaking.

The two most common and often conflicting journeys discussed by health-conscious consumers are the voyage of ketosis and the voyage of calorie counting.

The Keto Voyage (Low-Carb, High-Fat)

The journey into ketosis is a demanding one, requiring the navigator to steer clear of the treacherous reefs of carbohydrates and sugars.

For this voyage, minimizing carbs is the absolute priority, often taking precedence over total calories.

The intense debates found in keto-focused online communities reveal a clear consensus.⁷

For the strict keto navigator, the High-Intensity Searchlight (Heavy Cream) is the only acceptable tool for lightening coffee.

While it is a caloric heavyweight, its beam is exceptionally “pure” from a carbohydrate perspective, containing only about 0.8 g of carbs per two-tablespoon serving.⁶

The

Fresnel Lens (Half-and-Half), while lower in calories, contains 1.2 g of carbs for the same serving size.⁸

This may seem like a small difference, but for someone strictly limiting their intake to 20-30 g of carbs per day, that extra half-gram is a significant liability.

The sugars in half-and-half, while naturally occurring, can be enough to disrupt ketosis if consumed in large enough quantities.

The navigational chart for the keto dieter is therefore clear and strict:

1. Prioritize Heavy Cream: For adding creaminess, heavy cream is the superior choice due to its lower carbohydrate content.
2. Control the Pour: The high caloric load of heavy cream means portion control is paramount. The most common advice is to ask for just a “splash” or, even better, to order it on the side to control the amount precisely.¹⁷
3. Choose the Right Base Drink: A latte, even one made with heavy cream, contains a large volume of a dairy product and can quickly become a “calorie bomb” that stalls weight loss, a common concern among users.¹⁷ The recommended strategy is to order a base of black coffee or an Americano (espresso and water) and add a small, measured amount of heavy cream.¹⁷

The Calorie-Counting Voyage (Calorie Deficit for Weight Loss)

For the navigator whose primary goal is weight loss through a calorie deficit, the priorities are inverted.

The main objective is to minimize total energy intake (calories), and the high caloric density of heavy cream becomes a massive navigational hazard.

On this voyage, the High-Intensity Searchlight (Heavy Cream), at roughly 102 calories per two-tablespoon serving, is a tool to be avoided.

The Fresnel Lens (Half-and-Half) is a significant improvement at 40 calories, but the clear winner is the Hyper-Efficient LED (Unsweetened Almond Milk), which provides a hint of creaminess for a mere 5-10 calories.¹⁴

The navigational chart for the calorie-counter is a study in efficiency:

1. Embrace Almond Milk: For daily coffee, switching from a dairy creamer to unsweetened almond milk is the single most effective calorie-saving strategy.
2. Quantify the Savings: A daily grande coffee with a generous four-tablespoon “splash” of half-and-half could be contributing 80 calories. Switching to the same amount of almond milk would reduce that to just 10-20 calories. Over a week, this simple swap can save nearly 500 calories.
3. Build Your Own Low-Calorie Drink: Health-conscious sources consistently recommend starting with a low-calorie base like a black coffee or an Americano and then making mindful additions. One popular strategy is to order a coffee with a splash of half-and-half (for flavor) and a pump of sugar-free syrup, keeping the total calories under 50.³³

The Hidden Reef: The “At-Home” Creamer Trap

A particularly dangerous and often overlooked hazard on any nutritional voyage is the siren song of the Starbucks-branded retail creamers.

Many consumers, hoping to replicate their favorite coffee shop experience at home for less money, purchase these creamers from the grocery store.

However, an examination of their nutrition labels reveals a critical and alarming truth: these products are not simply packaged versions of what Starbucks uses in-store.

They are entirely different formulations, engineered for sweetness.

A single tablespoon (15 mL) of the retail Starbucks Caramel Macchiato creamer contains 40 calories and a staggering 6 grams of sugar.²⁶

To put this in perspective, that is ten times the amount of sugar found in an equivalent serving of the actual half-and-half used in their cafes.⁸

The primary ingredients in these creamers are often nonfat milk and sugar, followed by heavy cream and vegetable oil.²⁴

They are, in essence, liquid candy designed to taste like a Starbucks beverage.

Even the “Zero Sugar” versions are not free of consequence; they typically contain around 20 calories per tablespoon from fat and nonfat milk, along with artificial sweeteners like sucralose.²⁷

This hidden reef can easily shipwreck a well-intentioned health plan, as consumers unknowingly pour massive amounts of sugar and additives into their morning cup.

Conclusion: The Epiphany – Becoming the Lighthouse Keeper

My journey began in a fog of anxiety, lost in the ambiguity of a simple coffee order.

It ends here, in the clear, steady light of my own lighthouse.

The epiphany was not that half-and-half was “good” or “bad,” or that one milk was definitively superior to all others.

The epiphany was that ignorance was the true enemy.

My struggle was never with the coffee itself; it was with the lack of a framework to understand it.

The anxiety was a symptom of powerlessness.

The ultimate takeaway is this: the power to navigate the Starbucks menu, and indeed any complex nutritional landscape, lies in becoming the Lighthouse Keeper.

This is a conscious shift from being a passive consumer, subject to the whims of unmeasured pours and opaque recipes, to an active, informed navigator who is in complete control of their choices.

The goal is not to find the one “perfect” beam of light, but to understand the unique properties of every lens and to deploy the right one for the right purpose on any given day.

The ritual can, and should, remain a source of joy.

By taking control, you transform a moment of potential anxiety into an act of mindful, deliberate, and deeply satisfying indulgence.

The Keeper’s Handbook: Actionable Strategies for Navigational Control

1. Destroy the “Splash.” The single most empowering action a consumer can take is to eliminate the ambiguous “splash” from their vocabulary and their order. Ask for your milk or cream on the side. This breaks the cycle of the “free pour” and puts the measuring cup—and the control—back in your hands. It is the first and most crucial step in taking command of your lighthouse.¹
2. Know Your Beam. Internalize the master chart. Before you order, ask yourself: What is my journey today? Am I on a strict keto voyage where carbohydrates are the primary hazard? Deploy the High-Intensity Searchlight (Heavy Cream) with precision and discipline. Am I on a calorie-counting mission where total energy is the main concern? Engage the Hyper-Efficient LED (Almond Milk). Do I simply want a classic, comforting cup of coffee as a balanced treat? The Fresnel Lens (Half-and-Half) is a perfect choice, as long as you are the one pouring it.
3. Order the Base, Control the Add-in. The most strategic order is often the simplest: a brewed coffee or an Iced/Hot Americano. This provides a clean, predictable, near-zero-calorie base—the pure light source. You can then add your own measured “lens” (your milk or creamer of choice) to craft your drink with perfect precision. This strategy is consistently endorsed by the most savvy and health-conscious customers.¹⁷
4. Beware of Hidden Sugar Reefs. Approach all pre-flavored and pre-sweetened drinks with extreme skepticism. A “Vanilla Latte” is not just coffee and milk; it is coffee, milk, and multiple pumps of sugar-laden syrup. The sugar from the syrup in a standard flavored latte will almost always dwarf the naturally occurring sugar from the milk itself.¹⁶ Be especially wary of the retail at-home creamers, which are often sugar bombs in disguise.²⁶

The daily ritual need not be a source of conflict.

Armed with knowledge and a clear framework, you are no longer adrift.

You are the Lighthouse Keeper.

The cup is in your hands.

You are in control.

Works cited

1. help!!!! how many calories are in an a regular splash of half and half …, accessed August 1, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/starbucks/comments/ne26pg/help_how_many_calories_are_in_an_a_regular_splash/
2. How Many Calories in Ex Cream 3/4?? : r/starbucks – Reddit, accessed August 1, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/starbucks/comments/1gmpcr0/how_many_calories_in_ex_cream_34/
3. Cold Milk: Nutrition: Starbucks Coffee Company, accessed August 1, 2025, https://www.starbucks.com/menu/product/490/iced/nutrition
4. Espresso: Nutrition: Starbucks Coffee Company, accessed August 1, 2025, https://www.starbucks.com/menu/product/410/hot/nutrition
5. Heavy Cream vs. Half-and-Half vs. Coffee Creamer – Healthline, accessed August 1, 2025, https://www.healthline.com/nutrition/cream-vs-half-and-half-vs-coffee-creamer
6. Half-and-Half vs. Heavy Cream: What’s the Difference? – EatingWell, accessed August 1, 2025, https://www.eatingwell.com/article/8048612/half-and-half-vs-heavy-cream/
7. Heavy Whipping Cream VS Half & Half – keto – Reddit, accessed August 1, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/keto/comments/dtvu5l/heavy_whipping_cream_vs_half_half/
8. Starbucks Coffee, Cream, Fluid, Half And Half, Venti Nutrition Facts – Inlivo, accessed August 1, 2025, https://www.inlivo.com/nutrition/beverages/coffee-and-coffee-beverages/starbucks-coffee-cream-fluid-half-and-half-venti
9. All the Starbucks Milk Options, Explained – PureWow, accessed August 1, 2025, https://www.purewow.com/food/starbucks-milk-options
10. Starbucks Nutrition Information | PDF | Carbohydrates | Milk – Scribd, accessed August 1, 2025, https://www.scribd.com/document/440355813/Starbucks-Nutrition-Information
11. Dairy-Free Starbucks Drinks: Full Guide to Milk Options & Best Orders, accessed August 1, 2025, https://amazingfoodanddrink.com/drink/dairy-free-starbucks-drinks/
12. Lavender Oatmilk Latte: Nutrition: Starbucks Coffee Company, accessed August 1, 2025, https://www.starbucks.com/menu/product/2123829/hot/nutrition
13. Oat Latte: Nutrition: Starbucks Coffee Company, accessed August 1, 2025, https://www.starbucks.ca/menu/product/2123279/hot/nutrition
14. Low Carb Starbucks Drinks – Savory Tooth, accessed August 1, 2025, https://www.savorytooth.com/keto-starbucks-drinks/
15. Calories in Almond Milk by Starbucks and Nutrition Facts – MyNetDiary, accessed August 1, 2025, https://www.mynetdiary.com/food/calories-in-almond-milk-by-starbucks-cup-18728473-0.html
16. How Much Sugar Is In My Starbucks? – Inspira Health Network, accessed August 1, 2025, https://www.inspirahealthnetwork.org/news/healthy-living/how-much-sugar-my-starbucks
17. Keto latte? : r/starbucks – Reddit, accessed August 1, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/starbucks/comments/a773dt/keto_latte/
18. Is It Just a Splash of Cream? – Bariatric Eating, accessed August 1, 2025, https://www.bariatriceating.com/blogs/bariatric-advice-and-support/just-a-splash-of-cream-oh-really
19. Keto starbucks drinks : r/ketorecipes – Reddit, accessed August 1, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/ketorecipes/comments/1c7mbmv/keto_starbucks_drinks/
20. Eating & Drinking Keto @ Starbucks – from a barista : r/keto – Reddit, accessed August 1, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/keto/comments/1u91fv/eating_drinking_keto_starbucks_from_a_barista/
21. Keto drinks at Starbucks? – Reddit, accessed August 1, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/keto/comments/y95ja9/keto_drinks_at_starbucks/
22. Caffè Latte: Nutrition: Starbucks Coffee Company, accessed August 1, 2025, https://www.starbucks.com/menu/product/407/hot/nutrition
23. Nutrition Facts – Content – Health Encyclopedia – University of Rochester Medical Center, accessed August 1, 2025, https://www.urmc.rochester.edu/encyclopedia/content?contenttypeid=76&contentid=01077-2
24. Starbucks Caramel Macchiato Coffee Creamer – Product Detail Page | Cub, accessed August 1, 2025, https://www.cub.com/product/starbucks-coffee-creamer-caramel-00050000382767
25. Starbucks® Cinnamon Dolce Inspired Creamer, accessed August 1, 2025, https://athome.starbucks.com/products/cinnamon-dolce-inspired-dairy-creamer
26. Starbucks® Caramel Macchiato Inspired Creamer, accessed August 1, 2025, https://athome.starbucks.com/products/caramel-macchiato-inspired-dairy-creamer
27. Caramel Flavored Zero Creamer | Starbucks® Coffee at Home, accessed August 1, 2025, https://athome.starbucks.com/products/caramel-flavored-zero-creamer
28. Starbucks® Caramel Macchiato Inspired Non-Dairy Creamer, accessed August 1, 2025, https://athome.starbucks.com/products/caramel-macchiato-inspired-non-dairy-creamer
29. Calories in Oat Milk Latte Grande by Starbucks and Nutrition Facts – MyNetDiary, accessed August 1, 2025, https://www.mynetdiary.com/food/calories-in-oat-milk-latte-grande-by-starbucks-fl-oz-25449058-0.html
30. Starbucks half and half? : r/keto – Reddit, accessed August 1, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/keto/comments/922uid/starbucks_half_and_half/
31. Half & Half, where do we stand? : r/keto – Reddit, accessed August 1, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/keto/comments/1742jll/half_half_where_do_we_stand/
32. sugar free starbucks drinks still have sugar.. : r/keto – Reddit, accessed August 1, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/keto/comments/vyx9bh/sugar_free_starbucks_drinks_still_have_sugar/
33. Starbucks Calorie-Saver Swaps | newleaf-nutrition.com, accessed August 1, 2025, https://newleaf-nutrition.com/2019/10/03/starbucks-calorie-saver-swaps/
34. Cómo pedir el Mocha Blanco de Rubus bajo en calorías | TikTok, accessed August 1, 2025, https://www.tiktok.com/@minjulifts/video/7532861972916784397
35. Calories in Blonde Vanilla Latte with Half and Half and a Caramel Drizzle Tall by Starbucks and Nutrition Facts – MyNetDiary, accessed August 1, 2025, https://www.mynetdiary.com/food/calories-in-blonde-vanilla-latte-with-half-and-half-and-a-caramel-drizzle-tall-by-starbucks-fl-oz-48556411-0.html